Advice 
 
 
 
 
 
Tables
 
 
 
Betting
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Various
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 





 
Smartgambler Sports betting testimonials

Gambling related articles


Skilled Blackjack player tells his story.

----- Original Message -----
From: "White Knight" Zugszwang@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: Packer the Untouchable

This story begins a couple of years ago. CC is a law-abiding citizen of Melbourne. He enjoys visiting the huge new Crown Casino, opened recently with much fanfare by the government of the day. He has been promised the chance of winning riches and having fun in the process.

His game of choice is Blackjack, because it is recognised as a game of skill by everyone, including the casino. CC plays competition chess and enjoys a bit of a gamble. Over a period of two years CC loses around $25,000 playing Blackjack and doesn't really understand why.

CC has a brother who is a mathematics teacher, so he has a chat with him. Apparently Blackjack can be beaten if you play the correct strategy and count cards. There is nothing illegal about it as long as you don't use any electronic device. The advantage is very slim and requires loads of practice, perseverance and dedication. CC is a very determined character so he stops going to the casino and starts to save his money. In between working he reads everything ever written on the subject of Blackjack advantage play. He memorises cross-tables and practices card counting until it is as easy as reading. After 3 months he is ready for a triumphant return.

The real life conditions of Blackjack in a casino with its many distractions make things difficult for CC. It takes a further 3
months of practice before he can confidently keep up with the speed of the dealer and mentally block out the surrounding noise and movement. It also seems that whenever he raises his bet in a theoretically advantageous situation, the dealer pulls a 21 to blow him away. He refuses to become discouraged and returns to the firing line time and time again. Eventually he starts to have a few wins and his graphed results begin to have an upward trend. His records show that he wins 6/11 sessions, hardly setting the world alight, but probably to be expected with a less than one percent advantage.

Then, over time, he notices something unexpected and peculiar. Shift Supervisors and Pit Bosses who were once friendly towards him now look at him with suspicion and are very short in conversation. Whenever he moves to a new table the phone seems to ring. Dealers seem to be changed more regularly than before, which upsets his counting rhythm a little. CC wonders if it is his imagination or is there something to these observations? He has read a little about 'heat' from casino personnel, but doesn't think it would extend to relatively small fry like himself!

CC continues to visit the casino regularly and play Blackjack. He enjoys the mental challenge of making quick calculations and winning a little more than losing. He feels sorry for all the other people losing their weekly pay packets, savings and homes, but occasionally he finds another skillful player who plays in a similar manner and they have a chat. This goes on for another 6 months.

One day CC goes to the casino as usual. He passes by the huge stairway upon which the Premier had stood cutting the red ribbon a few years previously. He remembers how an invitation to all members of the community had been made on that day. CC looks for an empty spot at a Blackjack table. Suddenly a group of intimidating black-suited security men appear from nowhere. A tall man in a grey suit is with them as they surround CC. He announces himself as the manager of Crown Casino. He informs CC in much the way a policeman would read someone their rights that he is being restricted in his Blackjack play. He is allowed to bet the table minimum only and if found to be breaching this condition might be excluded from the casino. CC is given a letter to this effect. Everyone who witnesses this event assumes CC is some type of criminal.

CC is rightly stunned. He knows that the condition effectively means that he cannot play Blackjack with a long term advantage any more. The implications are that you are not allowed to win at the casino full stop! Is this right? Surely not! He goes home and begins some investigation. Through friends he discovers another chessplayer who has been restricted at Blackjack. After time he talks to 5 or 6 people in a similar situation and they tell him that nothing can be done. Not believing them for a minute, CC decides to write to the Victorian Casino and Gaming Authority (VCGA). After a month, the VCGA reply, stating that Crown Casino have acted within their rights and nothing will be done.

Next CC decides that he will try an action through the Equal Opportunity Commission. After several more months it is decided that there is no 'attribute' (sex, race, religion, etc.) being discriminated against and the action is thrown out. Not yet discouraged CC writes to the ACCC, the Gaming Minister, the Premier and anyone else he thinks will listen.

In the meantime he decides to test the casino's resolve and ignores the restriction. He believes it is his moral duty to do so. After a couple of warnings, CC gets 'side-roomed' and told that if he ever sets foot on any of the casino's property again (casino, restaurants, cinema, night-clubs, car-park, etc) he will be arrested for trespass. CC decides to spend a couple of weeks across the road from the casino handing out information to passers-by. He continues to send out letters.

Finally the VCGA decides to hold an inquiry into the rules of Blackjack which allow discrimination against skilled players. The public is invited to make submissions to the inquiry and a public meeting is even suggested. CC and many other restricted and banned players put forward their ideas to suggest a compromise position. After all, they recognise that a 'Whale' with a huge bankroll could conceivably dent a casino's profits in the long-run. The card counters' position is well thought out and reasonable, but after almost a years deliberation, the VCGA decides to side absolutely with the casino. No changes to the rules
will be made.

I am CC. I am the writer of the help-for-gamblers website www.whiteknightblackjack.com and I am looking for any legal avenue to challenge the rich casino owners of this country. Guaranteed, if I was a sports star or otherwise famous person instead of a nobody, I would not have received this unjust and humiliating treatment. Packer and others make billions from the
misery of others and it is a little known fact that they do not let anybody win, despite advertising to the contrary!

Regards,

'CC'.

0408 306 063


Back to Index


 

 

 

Home|FAQs|Disclaimer|Contact

©2000 - present. Ozmium Pty Ltd. All rights reserved